|
SKYAID |
EMS slower in suburbs added 11/01/01 Note: 40% of US population lives in the suburbs From http://www.sierraclub.org/sprawl/report00/police.aspFire, police and emergency medical services are crucial to our safety and our peace of mind. But sprawling development is stretching these services thin, forcing us to jeopardize our safety or pay higher taxes. And, since the true cost of extending these services out to sprawling communities isn't paid by the new residents, this cost becomes one more hidden sprawl subsidy. Fire and police stations are less expensive and land-intensive than roads or schools, but they entail sizable operating costs. Unlike schools, they are on-call 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Thus, even a small force of firefighters can cost a community more than $500,000 per year. (20) And since the size and placement of the force is driven by the need for short response times, the more spread out or poorly planned the transportation system, the more fire and police stations are required.
It's the same story on the East Coast. In Kennebunk, Maine, new development 25 minutes outside of town has created the need for another police patrol. The cruiser and officers needed for the patrol will cost this relatively small town $175,000 a year. (25) While the costs of more police, fire and emergency services are borne by both existing and new residents, the extra coverage usually benefits new residents alone. So taxpayers in existing communities end up footing much of the bill for extending the public safety net to new areas. Is there an alternative? Instead of building new facilities and hiring the requisite staff, communities can opt to stretch the existing service area. But stretching the service area means longer response times, which sacrifices public safety. The American Farmland Trust compared police, fire and emergency response times in four different communities in and around Chicago. Their research found, not surprisingly, that emergency personnel took longer to reach newer, sprawling communities. What was surprising was the difference. The fire department took, on average, almost three times as long to reach new, sprawling development as it did to reach development closer to existing communities. The difference in response times for most police calls was even more pronounced. (26) Instead of extending our service areas willy-nilly, we must follow a plan. And, we must charge new residents their fair share. Ensuring that new developments pay for the true cost of these services will save money-and possibly even lives. Full paper? http://www.farmlandinfo.org/cae/wp/98-1/wp98-1.htmlFinal paper http://www.farmlandinfo.org/cae/scatter/e-loe.html#find2
snippet from the above farmland URL
In contrast, people
living in the towns adjoining the scatter development waited an average of
6.4 minutes and 6.2 minutes, respectively. The relative frequency in Site
C was 3.2 percent and patients had to wait an average of 7.5 minutes.
All three scatter site averages exceed the recommended maximum for EMS
response time of four to six minutes.6
According to the American Heart Association, after a person has suffered a
heart attack, every minute that goes by without restoring the normal
heartbeat decreases chances of survival by 10 percent.
|